Shi, Z. et al. Sturdy steel–triazolate frameworks for CO2 seize from flue fuel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2750–2754 (2020).
Kim, E. J. et al. Cooperative carbon seize and steam regeneration with tetraamine-appended steel–natural frameworks. Science 369, 392–396 (2020).
Furukawa, H. et al. Water adsorption in porous steel–natural frameworks and associated supplies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4369–4381 (2014).
Furukawa, H., Cordova, Ok. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and functions of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).
Liu, J. et al. MOF-enabled confinement and associated results for chemical catalyst presentation and utilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 1045–1097 (2022).
Zhang, Y., Lan, P. C., Martin, Ok. & Ma, S. Porous pissed off Lewis pair catalysts: advances and perspective. Chem. Catal. 2, 439–457 (2022).
Yang, D. & Gates, B. C. Catalysis by steel natural frameworks: perspective and strategies for future analysis. ACS Catal. 9, 1779–1798 (2019).
Ling, L.-L., Yang, W., Yan, P., Wang, M. & Jiang, H.-L. Mild‐assisted CO2 hydrogenation over Pd3 Cu@UiO‐66 promoted by lively websites in shut proximity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202116396 (2022).
Horike, S., Dincǎ, M., Tamaki, Ok. & Lengthy, J. R. Dimension-selective Lewis acid catalysis in a microporous metal-organic framework with uncovered Mn2+ coordination websites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5854–5855 (2008).
Hermes, S. et al. Steel@MOF: loading of extremely porous coordination polymers host lattices by steel natural chemical vapor deposition. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 44, 6237–6241 (2005).
Horcajada, P. et al. Porous metal-organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a possible platform for drug supply and imaging. Nat. Mater. 9, 172–178 (2010).
Pang, Y. et al. Steel-organic framework nanoparticles for ameliorating breast cancer-associated osteolysis. Nano Lett. 20, 829–840 (2020).
Dong, Z., Solar, Y., Chu, J., Zhang, X. & Deng, H. Multivariate metal-organic frameworks for dialing-in the binding and programming the discharge of drug molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14209–14216 (2017).
Ettlinger, R. et al. Toxicity of metal-organic framework nanoparticles: from important analyses to potential functions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 464–484 (2022).
Della Rocca, J., Liu, D. & Lin, W. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for biomedical imaging and drug supply. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 957–968 (2011).
Liu, Z. et al. Extremely processable covalent natural framework gel electrolyte enabled by aspect‐chain engineering for lithium‐ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202110695 (2022).
Gao, C. et al. Steel‐natural framework glass anode with an distinctive biking‐induced capability enhancement for lithium‐ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2110048 (2022).
Zhou, J. & Wang, B. Rising crystalline porous supplies as a multifunctional platform for electrochemical power storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 6927–6945 (2017).
Zhang, X. et al. Steel-organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOF-derived supplies for power storage and conversion. Electrochem. Vitality Rev. 2, 29–104 (2019).
Shearer, G. C. et al. Defect engineering: tuning the porosity and composition of the metal-organic framework UiO-66 through modulated synthesis. Chem. Mater. 28, 3749–3761 (2016).
Trickett, C. A. et al. Definitive molecular degree characterization of defects in UiO-66 crystals. Angew. Chem. 127, 11314–11319 (2015).
Valenzano, L. et al. Disclosing the complicated construction of UiO-66 steel natural framework: a synergic mixture of experiment and concept. Chem. Mater. 23, 1700–1718 (2011).
Schrimpf, W. et al. Chemical variety in a metal-organic framework revealed by fluorescence lifetime imaging. Nat. Commun. 9, 1647 (2018).
Koschnick, C. et al. Understanding dysfunction and linker deficiency in porphyrinic zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks by resolving the Zr8O6 cluster conundrum in PCN−221. Nat. Commun. 12, 3099 (2021).
Fu, Y. et al. Duet of acetate and water on the defects of metal-organic frameworks. Nano Lett. 19, 1618–1624 (2019).
Pang, Q., Yang, L. & Li, Q. Vacancies in steel−natural frameworks: formation, association, and features. Small Struct. 3, 2100203 (2022).
Cai, G. & Jiang, H.-L. L. A modulator-induced defect-formation technique to hierarchically porous metal-organic frameworks with excessive stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 563–567 (2017).
Choi, Ok. M., Jeon, H. J., Kang, J. Ok. & Yaghi, O. M. Heterogeneity inside order in crystals of a porous metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11920–11923 (2011).
Tu, B. et al. Ordered vacancies and their chemistry in metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14465–14471 (2014).
Vermoortele, F. et al. Synthesis modulation as a software to extend the catalytic exercise of metal-organic frameworks: the distinctive case of UiO-66(Zr). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11465–11468 (2013).
Chen, X. et al. Tuning Zr12O22 node defects as catalytic websites within the metal-organic framework hcp UiO-66. ACS Catal. 10, 2906–2914 (2020).
Wang, J. et al. Engineering efficient structural defects of metal-organic frameworks to reinforce their catalytic performances. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 4464–4472 (2020).
Canivet, J., Vandichel, M. & Farrusseng, D. Origin of extremely lively metal-organic framework catalysts: defects? Defects! Dalt. Trans. 45, 4090–4099 (2016).
Cho, Ok. Y. et al. Facile management of defect web site density and particle dimension of UiO-66 for enhanced hydrolysis charges: insights into feasibility of Zr(IV)-based metal-organic framework (MOF) catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 245, 635–647 (2019).
Kozachuk, O. et al. Multifunctional, defect-engineered metal-organic frameworks with ruthenium facilities: sorption and catalytic properties. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 53, 7058–7062 (2014).
Gadipelli, S. & Guo, Z. Postsynthesis annealing of MOF−5 remarkably enhances the framework structural stability and CO2 uptake. Chem. Mater. 26, 6333–6338 (2014).
Ghosh, P., Colón, Y. J. & Snurr, R. Q. Water adsorption in UiO-66: the significance of defects. Chem. Commun. 50, 11329–11331 (2014).
Wu, H. et al. Uncommon and extremely tunable missing-linker defects in zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66 and their essential results on fuel adsorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10525–10532 (2013).
Fu, Y. et al. Defect‐assisted loading and docking conformations of prescribed drugs in metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 7719–7727 (2021).
Semino, R., Ramsahye, N. A., Ghoufi, A. & Maurin, G. Position of MOF floor defects on the microscopic construction of MOF/polymer interfaces: a computational research of the ZIF-8/PIMs techniques. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 254, 184–191 (2017).
Johnstone, D. N. et al. Direct imaging of correlated defect nanodomains in a metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 13081–13089 (2020).
Shearer, G. C. et al. Tuned to perfection: ironing out the defects in steel–natural framework UiO-66. Chem. Mater. 26, 4068–4071 (2014).
DeStefano, M. R., Islamoglu, T., Garibay, S. J., Hupp, J. T. & Farha, O. Ok. Room-temperature synthesis of UiO-66 and thermal modulation of densities of defect websites. Chem. Mater. 29, 1357–1361 (2017).
Smolders, S. et al. A titanium(IV)‐based mostly steel–natural framework that includes defect‐wealthy Ti‐O sheets as an oxidative desulfurization catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 9160–9165 (2019).
Feng, L. et al. Creating hierarchical pores by managed linker thermolysis in multivariate metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2363–2372 (2018).
Klet, R. C., Liu, Y., Wang, T. C., Hupp, J. T. & Farha, O. Ok. Analysis of Brønsted acidity and proton topology in Zr- and Hf-based steel–natural frameworks utilizing potentiometric acid–base titration. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 1479–1485 (2016).
Xue, Z. et al. Lacking-linker metal-organic frameworks for oxygen evolution response. Nat. Commun. 10, 5048 (2019).
Liu, L. et al. Imaging defects and their evolution in a metal-organic framework at sub-unit-cell decision. Nat. Chem. 11, 622–628 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. Cryo-EM constructions of atomic surfaces and host-guest chemistry in metal-organic frameworks. Matter 1, 428–438 (2019).
Daliang, Z. et al. Atomic-resolution transmission electron microscopy of electron beam-sensitive crystalline supplies. Science 359, 675–679 (2018).
Zhu, Y. et al. Unravelling floor and interfacial constructions of a metal-organic framework by transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Mater. 16, 532–536 (2017).
Shen, B., Chen, X., Shen, Ok., Xiong, H. & Wei, F. Imaging the node-linker coordination within the bulk and native constructions of metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 11, 2692 (2020).
Cliffe, M. J. et al. Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 5, 4176 (2014).
Kozachuk, O. et al. A strong‐resolution method to blended‐steel metal-organic frameworks—detailed characterization of native constructions, defects and respiratory behaviour of Al/V frameworks. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 4546–4557 (2013).
Nandy, A., Forse, A. C., Witherspoon, V. J. & Reimer, J. A. NMR spectroscopy reveals adsorbate binding websites within the metal-organic framework UiO-66(Zr). J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 8295–8305 (2018).
Krause, S. et al. Affect of defects and crystal dimension on unfavorable fuel adsorption in DUT-49 analyzed by in situ 129Xe NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 32, 4641–4650 (2020).
Grüninger, H. et al. Hydroxyl defects and oxide vacancies inside ringwoodite—towards understanding the defect chemistry of spinel-type oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 12001–12009 (2020).
Zhang, W., Chen, S., Terskikh, V. V., Lucier, B. E. G. & Huang, Y. Multinuclear solid-state NMR: Unveiling the native construction of faulty MOF MIL-120. Strong State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 119, 101793 (2022).
Bueken, B. et al. Tackling the defect conundrum in UiO-66: a mixed-linker method to engineering lacking linker defects. Chem. Mater. 29, 10478–10486 (2017).
Lawrence, M. C., Schneider, C. & Katz, M. J. Figuring out the structural stability of UiO-67 with respect to time: a solid-state NMR investigation. Chem. Commun. 52, 4971–4974 (2016).
Madsen, R. S. Ok. et al. Ultrahigh-field 67Zn NMR reveals short-range dysfunction in zeolitic imidazolate framework glasses. Science 367, 1473–1476 (2020).
Zhao, Q. et al. Discernment and quantification of inside and exterior acid websites on zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 4462–4469 (2002).
Xu, J., Wang, Q. & Deng, F. Steel lively websites and their catalytic features in zeolites: insights from solid-state NMR Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2179–2189 (2019).
Zheng, A., Liu, S., Bin & Deng, F. 31P NMR chemical shifts of phosphorus probes as dependable and sensible acidity scales for strong and liquid catalysts. Chem. Rev. 117, 12475–12531 (2017).
Yi, X. et al. Origin and structural traits of Tri-coordinated extra-framework aluminum species in dealuminated zeolites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10764–10774 (2018).
Yi, X., Ko, H. H., Deng, F., Liu, S.-B. & Zheng, A. Strong-state 31P NMR mapping of lively facilities and related spatial correlations in strong acid catalysts. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3527–3555 (2020).
Bornes, C. et al. 1H−31P HETCOR NMR elucidates the character of acid websites in zeolite HZSM-5 probed with trimethylphosphine oxide. Chem. Commun. 55, 12635–12638 (2019).
Zhang, C., Han, C., Sholl, D. S. & Schmidt, J. R. Computational characterization of defects in metal-organic frameworks: spontaneous and water-induced level defects in ZIF-8. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 459–464 (2016).
Dahnum, D. et al. Formation of defect web site on ZIF-7 and its impact on the methoxycarbonylation of aniline with dimethyl carbonate. J. Catal. 380, 297–306 (2019).
Li, Z. et al. Faulty 2D covalent natural frameworks for postfunctionalization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1909267 (2020).
Shi, Y. et al. Metalation of catechol‐functionalized faulty covalent natural frameworks for lewis acid catalysis. Small 16, 2001998 (2020).
Wei, R. et al. Tuning the properties of Zr6O8 nodes within the steel natural framework UiO-66 by number of node-bound ligands and linkers. Chem. Mater. 31, 1655–1663 (2019).
Chu, Y. et al. Acidic strengths of brønsted and lewis acid websites in strong acids scaled by 31P NMR chemical shifts of adsorbed trimethylphosphine. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 7660–7667 (2011).
Yang, Q. et al. Probing the dynamics of CO2 and CH4 throughout the porous zirconium terephthalate UiO-66(Zr): A synergic mixture of neutron scattering measurements and molecular simulations. Chem.—A Eur. J. 17, 8882–8889 (2011).
Cavka, J. H. et al. A brand new zirconium inorganic constructing brick forming steel natural frameworks with distinctive stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13850–13851 (2008).
Zheng, A., Deng, F. & Liu, S.-B. In Annual Reviews on NMR Spectroscopy Vol. 81, 47–108 (Elsevier Ltd., 2014).
Rojas, S. et al. Towards understanding drug incorporation and supply from biocompatible metal-organic frameworks in view of cutaneous administration. ACS Omega 3, 2994–3003 (2018).
Solar, C. Y. et al. Extremely secure crystalline catalysts based mostly on a microporous metal-organic framework and polyoxometalates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1883–1888 (2009).
Zheng, A. et al. 31P chemical shift of adsorbed trialkylphosphine oxides for acidity characterization of strong acids catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 7349–7356 (2008).
Bárcia, P. S. et al. Reverse form selectivity within the adsorption of hexane and xylene isomers in MOF UiO-66. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 139, 67–73 (2011).
Kolodziejski, W. & Klinowski, J. Kinetics of cross-polarization in solid-state NMR: a information for chemists. Chem. Rev. 102, 613–628 (2002).
Vidal, S. Security first: a current case of a dichloromethane injection harm. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 83–86 (2020).