Shi, Z. et al. Sturdy metallic–triazolate frameworks for CO2 seize from flue gasoline. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2750–2754 (2020).
Kim, E. J. et al. Cooperative carbon seize and steam regeneration with tetraamine-appended metallic–natural frameworks. Science 369, 392–396 (2020).
Furukawa, H. et al. Water adsorption in porous metallic–natural frameworks and associated supplies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4369–4381 (2014).
Furukawa, H., Cordova, Ok. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and purposes of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).
Liu, J. et al. MOF-enabled confinement and associated results for chemical catalyst presentation and utilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 1045–1097 (2022).
Zhang, Y., Lan, P. C., Martin, Ok. & Ma, S. Porous pissed off Lewis pair catalysts: advances and perspective. Chem. Catal. 2, 439–457 (2022).
Yang, D. & Gates, B. C. Catalysis by metallic natural frameworks: perspective and strategies for future analysis. ACS Catal. 9, 1779–1798 (2019).
Ling, L.-L., Yang, W., Yan, P., Wang, M. & Jiang, H.-L. Gentle‐assisted CO2 hydrogenation over Pd3 Cu@UiO‐66 promoted by energetic websites in shut proximity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202116396 (2022).
Horike, S., Dincǎ, M., Tamaki, Ok. & Lengthy, J. R. Measurement-selective Lewis acid catalysis in a microporous metal-organic framework with uncovered Mn2+ coordination websites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5854–5855 (2008).
Hermes, S. et al. Metallic@MOF: loading of extremely porous coordination polymers host lattices by metallic natural chemical vapor deposition. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 44, 6237–6241 (2005).
Horcajada, P. et al. Porous metal-organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a possible platform for drug supply and imaging. Nat. Mater. 9, 172–178 (2010).
Pang, Y. et al. Metallic-organic framework nanoparticles for ameliorating breast cancer-associated osteolysis. Nano Lett. 20, 829–840 (2020).
Dong, Z., Solar, Y., Chu, J., Zhang, X. & Deng, H. Multivariate metal-organic frameworks for dialing-in the binding and programming the discharge of drug molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14209–14216 (2017).
Ettlinger, R. et al. Toxicity of metal-organic framework nanoparticles: from important analyses to potential purposes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 464–484 (2022).
Della Rocca, J., Liu, D. & Lin, W. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for biomedical imaging and drug supply. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 957–968 (2011).
Liu, Z. et al. Extremely processable covalent natural framework gel electrolyte enabled by aspect‐chain engineering for lithium‐ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202110695 (2022).
Gao, C. et al. Metallic‐natural framework glass anode with an distinctive biking‐induced capability enhancement for lithium‐ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2110048 (2022).
Zhou, J. & Wang, B. Rising crystalline porous supplies as a multifunctional platform for electrochemical power storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 6927–6945 (2017).
Zhang, X. et al. Metallic-organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOF-derived supplies for power storage and conversion. Electrochem. Power Rev. 2, 29–104 (2019).
Shearer, G. C. et al. Defect engineering: tuning the porosity and composition of the metal-organic framework UiO-66 through modulated synthesis. Chem. Mater. 28, 3749–3761 (2016).
Trickett, C. A. et al. Definitive molecular stage characterization of defects in UiO-66 crystals. Angew. Chem. 127, 11314–11319 (2015).
Valenzano, L. et al. Disclosing the complicated construction of UiO-66 metallic natural framework: a synergic mixture of experiment and principle. Chem. Mater. 23, 1700–1718 (2011).
Schrimpf, W. et al. Chemical range in a metal-organic framework revealed by fluorescence lifetime imaging. Nat. Commun. 9, 1647 (2018).
Koschnick, C. et al. Understanding dysfunction and linker deficiency in porphyrinic zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks by resolving the Zr8O6 cluster conundrum in PCN−221. Nat. Commun. 12, 3099 (2021).
Fu, Y. et al. Duet of acetate and water on the defects of metal-organic frameworks. Nano Lett. 19, 1618–1624 (2019).
Pang, Q., Yang, L. & Li, Q. Vacancies in metallic−natural frameworks: formation, association, and capabilities. Small Struct. 3, 2100203 (2022).
Cai, G. & Jiang, H.-L. L. A modulator-induced defect-formation technique to hierarchically porous metal-organic frameworks with excessive stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 563–567 (2017).
Choi, Ok. M., Jeon, H. J., Kang, J. Ok. & Yaghi, O. M. Heterogeneity inside order in crystals of a porous metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11920–11923 (2011).
Tu, B. et al. Ordered vacancies and their chemistry in metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14465–14471 (2014).
Vermoortele, F. et al. Synthesis modulation as a instrument to extend the catalytic exercise of metal-organic frameworks: the distinctive case of UiO-66(Zr). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11465–11468 (2013).
Chen, X. et al. Tuning Zr12O22 node defects as catalytic websites within the metal-organic framework hcp UiO-66. ACS Catal. 10, 2906–2914 (2020).
Wang, J. et al. Engineering efficient structural defects of metal-organic frameworks to reinforce their catalytic performances. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 4464–4472 (2020).
Canivet, J., Vandichel, M. & Farrusseng, D. Origin of extremely energetic metal-organic framework catalysts: defects? Defects! Dalt. Trans. 45, 4090–4099 (2016).
Cho, Ok. Y. et al. Facile management of defect web site density and particle dimension of UiO-66 for enhanced hydrolysis charges: insights into feasibility of Zr(IV)-based metal-organic framework (MOF) catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 245, 635–647 (2019).
Kozachuk, O. et al. Multifunctional, defect-engineered metal-organic frameworks with ruthenium facilities: sorption and catalytic properties. Angew. Chem.—Int. Ed. 53, 7058–7062 (2014).
Gadipelli, S. & Guo, Z. Postsynthesis annealing of MOF−5 remarkably enhances the framework structural stability and CO2 uptake. Chem. Mater. 26, 6333–6338 (2014).
Ghosh, P., Colón, Y. J. & Snurr, R. Q. Water adsorption in UiO-66: the significance of defects. Chem. Commun. 50, 11329–11331 (2014).
Wu, H. et al. Uncommon and extremely tunable missing-linker defects in zirconium metal-organic framework UiO-66 and their necessary results on gasoline adsorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10525–10532 (2013).
Fu, Y. et al. Defect‐assisted loading and docking conformations of prescribed drugs in metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 7719–7727 (2021).
Semino, R., Ramsahye, N. A., Ghoufi, A. & Maurin, G. Position of MOF floor defects on the microscopic construction of MOF/polymer interfaces: a computational examine of the ZIF-8/PIMs methods. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 254, 184–191 (2017).
Johnstone, D. N. et al. Direct imaging of correlated defect nanodomains in a metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 13081–13089 (2020).
Shearer, G. C. et al. Tuned to perfection: ironing out the defects in metallic–natural framework UiO-66. Chem. Mater. 26, 4068–4071 (2014).
DeStefano, M. R., Islamoglu, T., Garibay, S. J., Hupp, J. T. & Farha, O. Ok. Room-temperature synthesis of UiO-66 and thermal modulation of densities of defect websites. Chem. Mater. 29, 1357–1361 (2017).
Smolders, S. et al. A titanium(IV)‐primarily based metallic–natural framework that includes defect‐wealthy Ti‐O sheets as an oxidative desulfurization catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 9160–9165 (2019).
Feng, L. et al. Creating hierarchical pores by managed linker thermolysis in multivariate metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2363–2372 (2018).
Klet, R. C., Liu, Y., Wang, T. C., Hupp, J. T. & Farha, O. Ok. Analysis of Brønsted acidity and proton topology in Zr- and Hf-based metallic–natural frameworks utilizing potentiometric acid–base titration. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 1479–1485 (2016).
Xue, Z. et al. Lacking-linker metal-organic frameworks for oxygen evolution response. Nat. Commun. 10, 5048 (2019).
Liu, L. et al. Imaging defects and their evolution in a metal-organic framework at sub-unit-cell decision. Nat. Chem. 11, 622–628 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. Cryo-EM buildings of atomic surfaces and host-guest chemistry in metal-organic frameworks. Matter 1, 428–438 (2019).
Daliang, Z. et al. Atomic-resolution transmission electron microscopy of electron beam-sensitive crystalline supplies. Science 359, 675–679 (2018).
Zhu, Y. et al. Unravelling floor and interfacial buildings of a metal-organic framework by transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Mater. 16, 532–536 (2017).
Shen, B., Chen, X., Shen, Ok., Xiong, H. & Wei, F. Imaging the node-linker coordination within the bulk and native buildings of metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 11, 2692 (2020).
Cliffe, M. J. et al. Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 5, 4176 (2014).
Kozachuk, O. et al. A stable‐answer strategy to combined‐metallic metal-organic frameworks—detailed characterization of native buildings, defects and respiration behaviour of Al/V frameworks. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 4546–4557 (2013).
Nandy, A., Forse, A. C., Witherspoon, V. J. & Reimer, J. A. NMR spectroscopy reveals adsorbate binding websites within the metal-organic framework UiO-66(Zr). J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 8295–8305 (2018).
Krause, S. et al. Influence of defects and crystal dimension on destructive gasoline adsorption in DUT-49 analyzed by in situ 129Xe NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 32, 4641–4650 (2020).
Grüninger, H. et al. Hydroxyl defects and oxide vacancies inside ringwoodite—towards understanding the defect chemistry of spinel-type oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 12001–12009 (2020).
Zhang, W., Chen, S., Terskikh, V. V., Lucier, B. E. G. & Huang, Y. Multinuclear solid-state NMR: Unveiling the native construction of faulty MOF MIL-120. Strong State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 119, 101793 (2022).
Bueken, B. et al. Tackling the defect conundrum in UiO-66: a mixed-linker strategy to engineering lacking linker defects. Chem. Mater. 29, 10478–10486 (2017).
Lawrence, M. C., Schneider, C. & Katz, M. J. Figuring out the structural stability of UiO-67 with respect to time: a solid-state NMR investigation. Chem. Commun. 52, 4971–4974 (2016).
Madsen, R. S. Ok. et al. Ultrahigh-field 67Zn NMR reveals short-range dysfunction in zeolitic imidazolate framework glasses. Science 367, 1473–1476 (2020).
Zhao, Q. et al. Discernment and quantification of inside and exterior acid websites on zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 4462–4469 (2002).
Xu, J., Wang, Q. & Deng, F. Metallic energetic websites and their catalytic capabilities in zeolites: insights from solid-state NMR Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2179–2189 (2019).
Zheng, A., Liu, S., Bin & Deng, F. 31P NMR chemical shifts of phosphorus probes as dependable and sensible acidity scales for stable and liquid catalysts. Chem. Rev. 117, 12475–12531 (2017).
Yi, X. et al. Origin and structural traits of Tri-coordinated extra-framework aluminum species in dealuminated zeolites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10764–10774 (2018).
Yi, X., Ko, H. H., Deng, F., Liu, S.-B. & Zheng, A. Strong-state 31P NMR mapping of energetic facilities and related spatial correlations in stable acid catalysts. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3527–3555 (2020).
Bornes, C. et al. 1H−31P HETCOR NMR elucidates the character of acid websites in zeolite HZSM-5 probed with trimethylphosphine oxide. Chem. Commun. 55, 12635–12638 (2019).
Zhang, C., Han, C., Sholl, D. S. & Schmidt, J. R. Computational characterization of defects in metal-organic frameworks: spontaneous and water-induced level defects in ZIF-8. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 459–464 (2016).
Dahnum, D. et al. Formation of defect web site on ZIF-7 and its impact on the methoxycarbonylation of aniline with dimethyl carbonate. J. Catal. 380, 297–306 (2019).
Li, Z. et al. Faulty 2D covalent natural frameworks for postfunctionalization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1909267 (2020).
Shi, Y. et al. Metalation of catechol‐functionalized faulty covalent natural frameworks for lewis acid catalysis. Small 16, 2001998 (2020).
Wei, R. et al. Tuning the properties of Zr6O8 nodes within the metallic natural framework UiO-66 by collection of node-bound ligands and linkers. Chem. Mater. 31, 1655–1663 (2019).
Chu, Y. et al. Acidic strengths of brønsted and lewis acid websites in stable acids scaled by 31P NMR chemical shifts of adsorbed trimethylphosphine. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 7660–7667 (2011).
Yang, Q. et al. Probing the dynamics of CO2 and CH4 throughout the porous zirconium terephthalate UiO-66(Zr): A synergic mixture of neutron scattering measurements and molecular simulations. Chem.—A Eur. J. 17, 8882–8889 (2011).
Cavka, J. H. et al. A brand new zirconium inorganic constructing brick forming metallic natural frameworks with distinctive stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13850–13851 (2008).
Zheng, A., Deng, F. & Liu, S.-B. In Annual Reviews on NMR Spectroscopy Vol. 81, 47–108 (Elsevier Ltd., 2014).
Rojas, S. et al. Towards understanding drug incorporation and supply from biocompatible metal-organic frameworks in view of cutaneous administration. ACS Omega 3, 2994–3003 (2018).
Solar, C. Y. et al. Extremely secure crystalline catalysts primarily based on a microporous metal-organic framework and polyoxometalates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1883–1888 (2009).
Zheng, A. et al. 31P chemical shift of adsorbed trialkylphosphine oxides for acidity characterization of stable acids catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 7349–7356 (2008).
Bárcia, P. S. et al. Reverse form selectivity within the adsorption of hexane and xylene isomers in MOF UiO-66. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 139, 67–73 (2011).
Kolodziejski, W. & Klinowski, J. Kinetics of cross-polarization in solid-state NMR: a information for chemists. Chem. Rev. 102, 613–628 (2002).
Vidal, S. Security first: a current case of a dichloromethane injection harm. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 83–86 (2020).