Wednesday, October 5, 2022
HomeChemistryBreast most cancers detection by analyzing the unstable natural compound (VOC) signature...

Breast most cancers detection by analyzing the unstable natural compound (VOC) signature in human urine


  • US Preventive Companies Job Pressure. Screening for breast most cancers: US Preventive Companies Job Pressure suggestion assertion. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(10), 716–236 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nelson, H. D. et al. Screening for breast most cancers: an replace for the US Preventive Companies Job Pressure. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(10), 727–737 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heart for Illness Management (CDC). Well being, United States, 2019, Desk 33.

  • Feldstein, A. C. et al. Affected person obstacles to mammography recognized throughout a reminder program. J. Womens Well being 20(3), 421–428 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jemal, Ahmedin, Ward, Elizabeth & Thun, Michael J. Latest developments in breast most cancers incidence charges by age and tumor traits amongst US ladies. Breast Most cancers Res. 9(3), 1–6 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Broeders, M. et al. The impression of mammographic screening on breast most cancers mortality in Europe: A overview of observational research. J. Med. Display screen. 19(1 suppl), 14–25 (2012).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blumen, H., Fitch, Ok. & Polkus, V. Comparability of remedy prices for breast most cancers, by tumor stage and kind of service. Am. Well being Drug Advantages 9(1), 23 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barlow, W. E. et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by traits of radiologists. J. Natl Most cancers Inst. 96(24), 1840–1850 (2004).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Desreux, J. A. Breast most cancers screening in younger ladies. Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 230, 208–211 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Siu, A. L. Screening for breast most cancers: US Preventive Companies Job Pressure suggestion assertion. Ann. Intern. Med. 164(4), 279–296 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sechopoulos, I., Suryanarayanan, S., Vedantham, S., D’Orsi, C. J. & Karellas, A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom research. Radiology 246(2), 434–443 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gøtzsche, P. C. The controversy on breast most cancers screening with mammography is vital. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 1(1), 8–14 (2004).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World Well being Group. WHO Place Paper on Mammography Screening (WHO, 2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • World Well being Group. Illness Burden and Mortality Estimates (WHO, 2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Apantaku, L. M. Breast most cancers analysis and screening. Am. Fam. Phys. 62(3), 596–602 (2000).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Podgornova, Y. A. & Sadykov, S. S. Detection of malignant breast tumors on the background of fibrocystic breast illness. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2210, 177 (2018).

  • Malherbe, Ok. & Fatima, S. Fibrocystic Breast Illness (2019).

  • Warner, E. et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and scientific breast examination. JAMA 292(11), 1317–1325 (2004).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mango, V. L., Goel, A., Mema, E., Kwak, E. & Ha, R. Breast MRI screening for averagerisk ladies: A Monte Carlo simulation costbenefit evaluation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 49(7), e216–e221 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Persaud, Krishna & Dodd, George. Evaluation of discrimination mechanisms within the mammalian olfactory system utilizing a mannequin nostril. Nature 299(5881), 352–355 (1982).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Asimakopoulos, A. D. et al. Prostate most cancers analysis via digital nostril within the urine headspace setting: A pilot research. Prostate Most cancers Prostatic Dis. 17(2), 206–211 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guerrero-Flores, H. et al. A non-invasive software for detecting cervical most cancers odor by trainedscent canines. BMC Most cancers 17(1), 79 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buszewski, B. et al. Identification of unstable lung most cancers markers by fuel chromatography-mass spectrometry: Comparability with discrimination by canines. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404(1), 141–146 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blatt, R., Bonarini, A. & Matteuci, M. Sample Classification Strategies for Lung Most cancers Analysis by an Digital Nostril 397–423 (Springer, 2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Phillips, M. et al. Fast point-of-care breath take a look at for biomarkers of breast most cancers and irregular mammograms. PLoS ONE 9(3), e90226 (2014).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burton, C. & Ma, Y. Present developments in most cancers biomarker discovery utilizing urinary metabolomics: Achievements and new challenges. Curr. Med. Chem. 24, 5–28 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, C. et al. Discriminating sufferers with early-stage breast most cancers from benign lesions by detection of oxidative DNA harm biomarker in urine. Oncotarget 8(32), 53100 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Horvath, G., Järverud, G., Järverud, S. & Horváth, I. Human ovarian carcinomas detected by particular odor. Integr. Most cancers Ther. 7(2), 76–80 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lavra, L. et al. Investigation of VOCs related to completely different traits of breast most cancers cells. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 13246 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Keulen, Ok. E., Jansen, M. E., Schrauwen, R. W., Kolkman, J. J. & Siersema, P. D. Unstable natural compounds in breath can function a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for the detection of superior adenomas and colorectal most cancers. Aliment. Pharmacol. Therap. 51(3), 334–346 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antoce, A. O. & Namolosanu, I. O. A. N. Fast and exact discrimination of wines via an digital nostril primarily based on gas-chromatography. Rev. Chim. 62(6), 593–595 (2011).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kishimoto, N. & Kashiwagi, A. Analysis of filtration on unstable compounds in virgin olive oils utilizing an digital nostril. In 2019 IEEE Worldwide Symposium on Olfaction and Digital Nostril (ISOEN), 1–3 (IEEE, 2019).

  • Dent, A., Sutedja, T. & Zimmerman, P. Exhaled breath evaluation for lung most cancers. J. Thorac. Dis. 63(2), 164–168 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, G. et al. Detection of lung, breast, colorectal and prostate cancers from exhaled breath utilizing a single array of nanosensors. Br. J. Most cancers 103(4), 542–551 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peled, N. et al. Non-invasive breath evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J. Thorac. Oncol. 7(10), 1528–1533 (2012).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Di Natale, C. et al. Lung most cancers identification by the evaluation of breath via an array of non-selective fuel sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 18(10), 1209–1218 (2003).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • D’Amico, A. et al. An investigation on digital nostril analysis of lung most cancers. Lung Most cancers 68(2), 170–176 (2010).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, Y., Li, Y., Luo, Z. & Duan, Y. Investigation of biomarkers for discriminating breast most cancers cell traces from regular mammary cell traces primarily based on VOCs evaluation and metabolomics. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 6(48), 41816–41824 (2016).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C. et al. Unstable natural metabolites determine sufferers with breast most cancers, cyclomastopathy, and mammary gland fibroma. Sci. Rep. 4(1), 5383 (2014).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Silva, C., Perestrelo, R., Silva, P., Tomás, H. & Câmara, J. Unstable metabolomic signature of human breast most cancers cell traces. Sci. Rep. 7, 43969 (2017).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, J. et al. Investigation of potential breath biomarkers for the early analysis of breast most cancers utilizing fuel chromatography-mass spectrometry. Clin. Chim. Acta 436, 59–67 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vignoli, A. et al. Precision oncology through NMR-based metabolomics: A overview on breast most cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(9), 4687 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weber, C. et al. Analysis of a fuel sensor array and sample recognition for the identification of bladder most cancers from urine headspace. Analyst 136(2), 359–364 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roine, A. et al. Detection of odor print variations between nonmalignant and malignant prostate cells with an digital nostril. Future Oncol. 8(9), 1157–1165 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watson, J. The tin oxide fuel sensor and its functions. Sens. Actuators 5(1), 29–42 (1984).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mazzone, P. et al. Analysis of lung most cancers by the evaluation of exhaled breath with a colorimetric sensor array. Thorax 62(7), 565–568 (2007).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Machado, R. et al. Detection of lung most cancers by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 171(11), 1286–1291 (2005).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dragonieri, S. et al. An digital nostril within the discrimination of sufferers with non-small cell lung most cancers and COPD. Lung Most cancers 64(2), 166–170 (2009).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Donovan, P. et al. Azathioprine and UVA mild generate mutagenic oxidative DNA harm. Science 309, 1871–1874 (2005).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brooks, S., Moore, D., Marzouk, E., Glenn, F. & Hallock, R. Canine olfaction and digital nostril detection of unstable natural compounds within the detection of most cancers: A overview. Most cancers Investig. 33(9), 411–419 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Listing of MAK and BAT Values 2017: Everlasting Senate Fee for the Investigation of Well being Hazards of Chemical Compounds within the Work Space. Report 53, Vol. 17, 1st ed, 14–36 (WILEYVCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, 2017).

  • ”The PubChem Mission”. Pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (2018) (Accessed 10 March 2018).

  • ”Human Metabolome Database”, HMDB. http://www.hmdb.ca (2018) (Accessed 30 Could 2018).

  • Mochalski, P. & Unterkofler, Ok. Quantification of chosen unstable natural compounds in human urine by fuel chromatography selective reagent ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (GC-SRI-TOF-MS) coupled with head-space solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). Analyst 141(15), 4796–4803 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brsan, N. & Weimar, U. Understanding the elemental ideas of steel oxide primarily based fuel sensors; the instance of CO sensing with SnO2 sensors within the presence of humidity. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15(20), 813–839 (2003).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henriksen, T., Hillestrom, P., Poulsen, H. & Weimann, A. Automated technique for the direct evaluation of 8-oxo-guanosine and 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine in human urine utilizing ultraperformance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 47(5), 629–635 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, S. et al. A comparative research of the evaluation of human urine headspace utilizing fuel chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Breath Res. 2, 037022 (2008).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Allen, B. et al. Ketogenic diets as an adjuvant most cancers remedy: Historical past and potential mechanism. Redox Biol. 2, 963–970 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • RELATED ARTICLES

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments